Thought behind this journal

Keeping in view the Philosophy of Maharishi Dayanand Saraswati ji, BCM College moves ahead with the mission to create through education a valuable asset to the nation in the form of talented and dedicated teachers who can help in the all round and homogeneous development of their students through 3 H’S (Head, Heart and Hand); 3 R’S (Reading, Rhetoric and Writing); and 5 C’S (Contact, Communicate, Compete, Culture and Character) We have the mission to develop the intellectual and creative faculties of our pupil teachers to enable them not only to with stand the changes in the field of education but also to lead by innovative initiatives. for the achievement of our mission research culture of the institute plays a vital role to achieve this mission ,So bcm college has taken initiative and launched its e-journal under the guidance of

Sh.Staya Nand Munjal ji(President)

Sh.S.K.Mehta (Secretary )

Sh.R.B Khanna,(Executive member)

Dr.Khushvinder kumar (Principal)

We hope and strongly believe, this will nurture research culture among creative and critical minds of teaching community, budding researchers and the ignited minds of our students.


Monday, November 22, 2010

EFFECT OF CONCEPT ATTAINMENT MODEL ON MATHEMATICS CONCEPT UNDERSTANDING OF CLASS VII STUDENTS

EFFECT OF CONCEPT ATTAINMENT MODEL ON MATHEMATICS CONCEPT UNDERSTANDING OF CLASS VII STUDENTS
Ms. Rama Rani, Lecturer, KC College of Education, Nawanshahr
Mrs. Ravdeep Kaur, Lecturer, BCM College of Education, Ludhiana

Abstract
The present study was experimental in nature. It was an attempt to study the effectiveness of Concept Attainment Model in relation to Traditional Method of teaching. For this purpose sample of 87 students studying in the class VII was taken. Investigator developed Mathematics Concept Understanding Test to assess the Mathematics Concept Understanding of the students. Data was analyzed with the help of One Way Analysis of Covariance. It was found that CAM was effective in terms of Mathematics Concept Understanding of students. Also CAM was found to be more effective in terms of Mathematics Concept Understanding than Traditional Method of teaching mathematics when groups were matched with respect to Pre - Mathematics Concept Understanding. 


 Keywords- Concept Attainment Model, Traditional Method, Analysis of Covariance.

INTRODUCTION
      The teacher - learning process is the important variable that influence directly on achievement of the students. The effective teaching strategy helps the students to attain the educational objectives in a better way. Teaching is considered as the sharing of experiences between teacher and students in a teaching - learning situation. A model of teaching is such a specific pattern of plan, which can be used to shape curriculum, to select instructional material, to guide teacher’s action and to help the learner to achieve the specific objectives.
Joyce &Weil (1992) have searched and researched on a variety of strategies developed by different learning theories and related principles and designed a number of models of teaching. Concept Attainment Model (CAM) was developed from the work of Jerome Bruner, Jacqueline Good Now & George Austin. Bruner stated that the role of teacher is to create situation, in which students can learn on their own rather than to provide, packaged information to students. CAM consists of two types i.e. Reception Model and Selection Model. In the present study, the investigator used reception model of concept attainment model.
Studies have been conducted to find out the relative effectiveness of CAM and Traditional Method of teaching (Kumara, 1985; Sushma, 1987; Agarwal and Mishra, 1988; Bhaveja, 1989; Chaudhury, 1989; Passi, Singh, and Sansanwal, 1989; Singh, 1990; Jamini, 1991; Manocha, 1991; Mahajan, 1992; Mohanty, 1992; Viney, 1992; Chopra, 1994; Kumar, 2005; and Gupta, 2006). These studies were conducted in different teaching subjects and did not reveal any generalized inference. So, further studies are required to conclude. Keeping this in mind, the present study was conducted.      
Objective
The objective of the study was:
To compare the adjusted mean scores of Mathematics Concept Understanding of Concept Attainment Model and Traditional Method Groups by considering Pre-Mathematics Concept Understanding as covariate.
Hypothesis
The hypothesis of the study was:
There is no significant difference in adjusted mean scores of Mathematics Concept Understanding of Concept Attainment Model and Traditional Method Groups when Pre-Mathematics Concept Understanding is taken as a covariate.
METHOD
Sample
The sample consisted of 87 class VII students (45 from Government Senior Secondary School, Goraya and 42 from Punjab Rural Academy, Goraya) selected by purposive sampling method. They were randomly assigned to the Concept Attainment Group and Traditional Method Group.
Tools
Mathematics Concept Understanding Test developed by the investigators was used to assess the Mathematics Concept Understanding of students.
Data Collection
                Before starting the experiment, the Mathematics Concept Understanding Test developed by the investigators was administered to the students of both Concept Attainment and Traditional Method Groups. This constituted the Pre-Mathematics Concept Understanding scores. The Concept Attainment Group students were taught topic from the syllabus of Mathematics of Punjab School Education Board of Class VII through the use of CAM and the students of control group were taught the same topics through traditional method of teaching. The treatment lasted about 20 days at the rate of 35 minutes per day in all groups. Investigator made each possible attempt to make the teaching environment similar in both Concept Attainment and Traditional Method Groups. At the end of treatment, the Mathematics Concept Understanding Test that was administered before the treatment was administered again on students of the Concept Attainment and Traditional Method Groups
Result and Discussion
Data was analyzed with the help of One Way Analysis of covariance and the results are given in the Table 1
Table 1
Summary of One way Analysis of Variance of Mathematics Concept Understanding by considering Pre - Mathematics Concept Understanding as Covariate

Source of Variance
df
Sum of Square
Mean Square
F-value
Treatment
1
2346.21
2346.21
153.10**
Error
83
1271.90
15.32

Total
87




** Significant at 0.01 Level
From the table 1, it can be seen that the adjusted F-value is 153.10, which is significant at 0.01 level with df = 1/83. It indicates that adjusted mean scores of CAM group and Traditional Method Group differ significantly when pre-Mathematics Concept Understanding was considered as covariate. Further the adjusted mean scores of Mathematics Concept Understanding of CAM Group was 31.28, which is significantly higher than that of Traditional Method Group whose adjusted mean score was 20.44. It reflects that treatment given to CAM group, in relation to Traditional Method was found to be significantly superior when Pre-Mathematics Concept Understanding was taken as covariate. It may, therefore, said that CAM was found to be superior to Traditional Method in learning Mathematics.
REFERENCES
Agarwal, R. and Mishra, K.S.(1988). Effectiveness of Reception Concept  Attainment Model of teaching for enhancing attainment of science Concepts. Indian Education Review,Vol.23(2).
Bhaveja,B.(1989). Information Processing Models of Teaching in the Indian Classroom. Indian Educational Review, Vol.24(1).
Chaudhury, K. (1989). Teaching of Concept through the Concept Attainment Model and Facts through Traditional Teaching Competency in teaching skills of pre-service teachers. University of Poona.
Chopra, Seema.  (1994).  A Study of  Effectiveness of Bruner’s Concept  Attainment Model in learning of concept in English
            M.Ed.dissertation, Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra.
Gupta. (2006). Effect of Concept Attainment Model on understanding of  Mathematics concept in class IX. M.Ed Dissertation, Guru Nanak Dev Univ. Amritsar.
Jamini, Nirupama,(1991).Effect of Teaching Strategies on conceptual –  learning efficiency and retention in relation to divergent thinking  .Ph.D.Edu., Univ. of  Delhi. 
Joyce, B., Weil, M., & Calhoun, E. (2009). Models of teaching (8th ed.). Boston:Pearson Education, Inc.McDonald, D.
Kumar, A. (2005). Effect of Concept Attainment Model on understanding of concept in physics in class IX. M.Ed Dissertation, Guru Nanak Dev Univ. Amritsar.
Kumara, s. (1985). Effectiveness of Concept Attainment Model in terms of
           Pupil Achievement and their Reactions. M.Ed Dissertation, Devi                   
           Ahilya Vishwa Vidyalaya, Indore.
Mahajan,Jyotsna.(1992).A Comparative study of Effectiveness of two Models of teaching,Viz. Bruner’s Concept Attainment Model and Ausubei’s Advance Organiser Model on the teaching abilities of student-teachers and on achievement of students in various schools.Ph.D.Edu.,Shreemati Nathibai Damodar Thackersey Women Univ.
Manocha, Vineeta.(1991).Development of textual material in biology for class IX using Bruner’s Concept Attainment Model of teaching. Ph.D.Edu., Devi Ahilya Vishwa Vidyalaya, Indore.
Mohanty, B.K.(1992). A study of the relative Effectiveness of using the jurisprudential Inquiry Model and the Concept Attainment Model in the cognitive development in moral-judgment, moral-concepts and personal-values of sec. school students. Ph.D.Edu.,Utkal Univ.
Passi, Singh, L.C. and Sansanwal, D.N.(1989). Effectiveness of strategy training in models of teaching. An experimental study. Indian educational review,Vol.24(1):36-58.
Singh, Daijeet K.(1990). Effectiveness of  Inquiry Training Model and  Concept Attainment Model over traditional teaching methods for teaching physical science.Ph.D.Edu.,Kumaun Univ.
Sushma.(1987). Effectiveness of Concept Attainment Model and Biological Science model to eight class students. Dept. of Edu. BHU.
Viney. (1992). Effectiveness of Different Models of teaching on achievement in mathematics Concept and Attitude in relation to intelligence and cognative style.Ph.D.Edu.,Punjab Univ.